4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Comparison of thermoluminescence response of different sized Ge-doped flat fibers as a dosimeter

Journal

RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 116, Issue -, Pages 155-159

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.03.038

Keywords

Thermo luminescence; Photon beam; Linear accelerator (LINAC); Ge-doped flat fiber; Threshold dose

Funding

  1. Grants University of Malaya- Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia UM-MOHE High Impact Research Grant [UM.C/625/1/HIR/33]
  2. Multimedia University Malaysia Fundamental Research Grant Scheme [FRGS/1/2012/SG02/MMU/02/2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prime dosimetric properties, including dose-response, linearity with dose, energy response, fading and threshold doses were investigated for three different dimension Ge-doped flat fibers. The results of measurement were also compared with two of the more commonly used standard TLD media, TLD-100 (LiF:Mg,Ti-7.5%(LiF)-Li-6) and TLD-700 ((LiF)-Li-7:Mg,Ti 99.9%(LiF)-Li-7) chips. The flat cross-section samples (60 x 180) mu m(2), (100 x 350) mu m(2) and (200 x 750) mu m(2) were fabricated using the Modified Chemical Vapor Deposition (MCVD) process and pulled from the same preform. In the study, all flat fiber samples provided good linear dose-response for the photon and electron beams generated using a medical linear accelerator (LINAC), for doses in the range 0.5-8 Gy. Among the samples, the smallest dimension flat fiber provided the best response, with a sensitivity of some 61% and 54%, respectively of that of the TLD-100 and TLD-700 chips. The energy responses of the samples were studied for various photon (6 MV, 10 MV) and electron (6 MeV, 9 MeV) beam energies. it fading of around 20% was observed over a period of thirty (30) days. These favorable TL characteristics point towards promising development of Ge-doped flat fibers for use in radiotherapy dosimetry. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available