4.7 Review

The molecular characterization and clinical management of multiple myeloma in the post-genome era

Journal

LEUKEMIA
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages 1941-1956

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2009.160

Keywords

gene-expression profiling; array comparative hybridization; multiple myeloma; classification; prognosis

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [CA55819-09, CA97513-01]
  2. Lebow Fund to Cure Myeloma
  3. Nancy and Stephen Grand Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer-causing mutations disrupt coordinated, precise programs of gene expression that govern cell growth and differentiation. Microarray-based gene-expression profiling (GEP) is a powerful tool to globally analyze these changes to study cancer biology and clinical behavior. Despite overwhelming genomic chaos in multiple myeloma (MM), expression patterns within tumor samples are remarkably stable and reproducible. Unique expression patterns associated with recurrent chromosomal translocations and ploidy changes defined molecular classes with differing clinical features and outcomes. Combined molecular techniques also dissected two distinct, reproducible forms of hyperdiploid disease and have molecularly defined MM with high risk for poor clinical outcome. GEP is now used to risk-stratify patients with newly diagnosed MM. Groups with high-risk features are evident in all GEP-defined MM classes, and GEP studies of serial samples showed that risk increases over time, with relapsed disease showing dramatic GEP shifts toward a signature of poor outcomes. This suggests a common mechanism of disease evolution and potentially reflects preferential expansion of therapy-resistant cells. Correlating GEP-defined disease class and risk with outcomes of therapeutic regimens reveals class-specific benefits for individual agents, as well as mechanistic insights into drug sensitivity and resistance. Here, we review modern genomics contributions to understanding MM pathogenesis, prognosis, and therapy. Leukemia (2009) 23, 1941-1956; doi: 10.1038/leu. 2009.160; published online 6 August 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available