4.7 Article

Increased bone marrow microvascular density in haematological malignancies is associated with differential regulation of angiogenic factors

Journal

LEUKEMIA
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 162-169

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2008.255

Keywords

angiogenesis; lymphoma; myeloma; bone marrow; VEGF

Funding

  1. Norwegian South-Eastern Health Authority Trust (fellowship for HFSN)
  2. Ulleva l University Hospital Trust
  3. University of Oslo, Norway

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antiangiogenic drugs are currently tested in haematological malignancies. As these drugs target different angiogenic regulators, and as cancers are inherently heterogeneous, a detailed characterization of angiogenesis in individual cancers is needed. Hence, we measured bone marrow microvessel density (MVD), plasma concentrations of eight angiogenesis-related parameters and the expression in blood mononuclear cells of 40 angiogenesis-related mRNAs in 93 patients with haematological neoplasias (acute myeloid leukaemia; chronic lymphatic leukaemia; multiple myeloma (MM); or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)) before start and after completion of cancer therapy. Compared with healthy individuals, the patients had significantly increased bone marrow MVD, especially patients with advanced stage disease. A novel finding was that patients with NHL also had increased bone marrow MVD. The plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 were significantly increased. VEGF levels were highest in those who did not achieve complete remission after cancer therapy. The mRNA expression of IL-8 was upregulated 15-fold. Our data show that patients with haematological malignancies have increased bone marrow MVD; hence, supporting the notion that bone marrow angiogenesis plays a role in the pathogenesis and progression of these cancers. VEGF, IL-6 and IL-8 seem to contribute to the malignant phenotype.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available