4.7 Review

Treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma

Journal

LEUKEMIA
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 449-456

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2008.325

Keywords

new drugs; therapy; diagnosis; myeloma

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA093842, CA 62242, CA107476, R01 CA107476, P01 CA062242, CA 100080, R01 CA100080, CA 93842] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA100080, P01CA062242, R01CA093842, R01CA107476] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The introduction of thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide has dramatically changed the treatment paradigm of multiple myeloma (MM). In patients eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), combinations including thalidomide/dexamethasone (Thal/Dex) or bortezomib/dexamethasone (Bort/Dex) or lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Rev/Dex) have been introduced as induction regimens in patients eligible for ASCT. New induction regimens have significantly increased complete response rate before and after ASCT with a positive impact on progression-free survival. Maintenance therapy with thalidomide, under investigation with lenalidomide, may further prolong remission duration. In patients not eligible for ASCT, randomized studies have shown that melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide (MPT) and melphalan, prednisone and bortezomib (MPV) are both superior to melphalan and prednisone (MP), and are now considered standard of care. Ongoing trials will soon assess if MP plus lenalidomide may be considered an attractive option. More complex regimens combining thalidomide or bortezomib or lenalidomide with cyclophosphamide or doxorubicin have been also tested. In small cohorts of patients bortezomib or lenalidomide may overcome the poor prognosis induced by deletion 13 or translocation t(4; 14) or deletion 17p13. If these data will be confirmed, a cytogenetically risk-adapted strategy might become the most appropriate strategy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available