4.3 Article

Inhibition of urease activity in the urinary tract pathogen Staphylococcus saprophyticus

Journal

LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages 31-41

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/lam.12153

Keywords

chemical inhibitor; inhibition kinetics; Staphylococcus saprophyticus; urease; urinary tract infection

Funding

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute through the Undergraduate Science Education Program
  2. ASU School of Life Sciences
  3. New College Undergraduate Inquiry and Research Experiences Program at the West campus of Arizona State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urease is a virulence factor for the Gram-positive urinary tract pathogen Staphylococcus saprophyticus. The susceptibility of this enzyme to chemical inhibition was determined using soluble extracts of Staph. saprophyticus strain ATCC 15305. Acetohydroxamic acid (K-i = 8.2 mu g ml(-1) = 0.106 mmol l(-1)) and DL-phenylalanine hydroxamic acid (K-i = 21 mu g ml(-1) = 0.116 mmol l(-1)) inhibited urease activity competitively. The phosphorodiamidate fluorofamide also caused competitive inhibition (K-i = 0.12 mu g ml(-1) = 0.553 mu mol l(-1) = 0.000553 mmol l(-1)), but the imidazole omeprazole had no effect. Two flavonoids found in green tea extract [(+)-catechin hydrate (K-i = 357 mu g ml(-1) = 1.23 mmol l(-1)) and (-)-epigallocatechin gallate (K-i = 210 mu g ml(-1) = 0.460 mmol l(-1))] gave mixed inhibition. Acetohydroxamic acid, DL-phenylalanine hydroxamic acid, fluorofamide, (+)-catechin hydrate and (-)-epigallocatechin gallate also inhibited urease activity in whole cells of strains ATCC 15305, ATCC 35552 and ATCC 49907 grown in a rich medium or an artificial urine medium. Addition of acetohydroxamic acid or fluorofamide to cultures of Staph. saprophyticus in an artificial urine medium delayed the increase in pH that normally occurs during growth. These results suggest that urease inhibitors may be useful for treating urinary tract infections caused by Staph. saprophyticus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available