4.3 Article

A sensitive and specific nanoparticle-assisted PCR assay for rapid detection of porcine parvovirus

Journal

LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages 163-167

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/lam.12171

Keywords

nanoPCR; NS1 gene; PPV; sensitivity; specificity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31001069, 31172349, 31172341]
  2. Chinese State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology Fund [NKLVBP 201108]
  3. National High-tech RDProgram [863-2011AA10A208/2011AA10A200]
  4. Excellent Youth Foundation of Heilongjiang Scientific Committee [JC201216]
  5. National Science and Technology Achievement Transformation Project [2012GB23260557]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel nanoparticle-assisted polymerase chain reaction (nanoPCR) assay to detect porcine parvovirus (PPV) is described here. Primers for this assay were designed based on the conserved region of the nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) gene of PPV, which encodes one of the nonstructural proteins. The sensitivity of the PPV nanoPCR assay was measured by using diluted recombinant plasmids in which the PPV NS1 gene had been inserted. The detection limit was 5.6 x 10(1) copies mu l(-1) for the PPV nanoPCR assay vs 5.6 x 10(3) copies mu l(-1) for conventional PCR assay. The results showed that the sensitivity of PPV nanoPCR assay was 100 times higher than that of conventional PCR assay. The PPV nanoPCR assay produced 142-bp product as expected when amplifying PPV DNA, while produced nothing when amplifying the DNA or cDNA of the following viruses: swine encephalomyocarditis virus, classical swine fever virus, porcine pseudorabies virus, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, porcine teschovirus and porcine circovirus type II. PPV was detected in 108 of 109 clinical swine samples from Heilongjiang, Jilin and Henan provinces using the nanoPCR assay, and the results were confirmed by sequencing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available