4.3 Article

The development of loop-mediated isothermal amplification combined with lateral flow dipstick for detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus

Journal

LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages 344-351

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2011.03007.x

Keywords

loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP); PCR; tlh gene; Vibrio parahaemolyticus

Funding

  1. Thailand Research Fund (TRF)
  2. Office of Commission on Higher Education, Thailand

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: The current study was aimed to develop a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) combined with amplicon detection by chromatographic lateral flow dipstick (LFD) assay for rapid and specific detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Methods and Results: Biotinylated LAMP amplicons were produced by a set of four designed primers that recognized specifically the V. parahaemolyticus thermolabile haemolysin (tlh) gene followed by hybridization with an FITC-labelled probe and LFD detection. The optimized time and temperature conditions for the LAMP assay were 90 min at 65 degrees C. The LAMP-LFD method accurately identified 28 isolates of V. parahaemolyticus but did not detect 24 non-parahaemolyticus Vibrio isolates and 35 non-Vibrio bacterial isolates. The sensitivity of LAMP-LFD for V. parahaemolyticus detection in pure cultures was 120 CFU ml-1. In the case of spiked shrimp samples without enrichment, the detection limit for V. parahaemolyticus was 1 center dot 8 x 103 CFU g-1 or equivalent to 3 CFU per reaction while that of conventional PCR was 30 CFU per reaction. Conclusions: The established LAMP-LFD assay targeting tlh gene was specific, rapid and sensitive for identification of V. parahaemolyticus. Significance and Impact of the Study: The developed LAMP-LFD assay provided a valuable tool for detection of V. parahaemolyticus and can be used effectively for identification of V. parahaemolyticus in contaminated food sample.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available