4.3 Article

Lack of O-polysaccharide enhances biofilm formation by Bradyrhizobium japonicum

Journal

LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages 452-456

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.02813.x

Keywords

biofilm; Bradyrhizobium japonicum; hydrophobicity; lipopolysaccharide; O-polysaccharide

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2009-0072683]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0072683] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To reveal the effects of the O-polysaccharide antigen of Bradyrhizobium japonicum LPS on biofilm formation and motility. Methods and Results: Wild type and O-antigen-deficient mutant strains of B. japonicum were tested for biofilm formation on polyvinyl chloride (PVC) surfaces and motility on semi-solid (0 center dot 3%) agar media. After 7 days of incubation, the amount of biofilms formed by the mutant was c. 3 center dot 5-fold greater than that of the wild type. Unlike biofilm formation, the motility assay revealed that the mutant strain was less motile than the wild type. Conclusions: This study shows enhanced biofilm formation and decreased motility by the O-antigen-deficient mutant, suggesting that the lack of the O-polysaccharide of the rhizobial LPS is associated with biofilm-forming ability and movement. Significance and Impact of the Study: LPS plays an important role in both pathogenic and beneficial bacteria. It has also been reported that LPS deficiency negatively affects biofilm formation. However, our results demonstrate that the O-antigen-deficient mutant enhances biofilm formation, presumably through a significant increase in hydrophobicity. It is notable that the hydrophobicity of cell walls might be a key regulator in controlling biofilm development in B. japonicum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available