4.2 Article

Major controls on architecture, sequence stratigraphy and paleosols of middle Pleistocene continental sediments (Qc Unit), eastern central Italy

Journal

QUATERNARY RESEARCH
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages 565-581

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.yqres.2015.01.006

Keywords

MIS 11; MIS 9; Pleistocene paleosols; Fluvial stratigraphy; Pedo-stratigraphy

Funding

  1. Shell
  2. Total

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Middle Pleistocene continental sediments in central Italy (Qc Unit) record the oldest fluvial accumulation along the uplifting margin of the Pen-Adriatic basin. The architecture of the sediment body can be divided into two unconformity-bounded, fining-upward cycles interpreted as genetically related depositional sequences. These sequences highlight the systematic adjustment of the fluvial system to changes in the ratio between accommodation space and sediment supply (A/S ratio) and, from base to top, comprise the following surfaces and strata! components: (i) a regionally correlative sequence boundary resulting from an A/S ratio <= 0; (ii) a low-accommodation systems tract characterized by conglomerate-rich, amalgamated channel fills and recording an A/S ratio < 1; (iii) an expansion surface marking the turnaround point from low-accommodation systems tract to high-accommodation systems tract deposits; (iv) a high-accommodation systems tract dominated by floodplain fines encasing lens-like, fluvial channel deposits and denoting an A/S ratio > 1; and (v) a mature red argillic paleosol. To constrain the climatic signal for paleosols formation, the two sequence-capping mature paleosols have been investigated. The results of these studies suggest that they were developed under humid and warm climatic conditions associated with interglacial phases, which have been correlatively attributed to Marine Oxygen Isotope Stages 11 and 9. (C) 2015 University of Washington. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available