4.5 Article

Development of the Rat Larynx: A Histological Study

Journal

LARYNGOSCOPE
Volume 123, Issue 12, Pages 3093-3098

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lary.24145

Keywords

Embryogenesis; development; larynx; rat; recurrent laryngeal nerve

Funding

  1. Department of Otolaryngology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives/HypothesisTo evaluate and describe the cartilaginous and muscular development of the rat larynx. Study DesignHistologic evaluation. MethodsThe larynges of Sprague Dawley rats of embryonic day (E) 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, postnatal day 0, 14, and adult of 250 gm were collected. Four larynges of each age were harvested, cut into 15-m serial sections, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and evaluated under light microscopy. Representative digital images were recorded and evaluated at the preglottic (supraglottic in humans), glottic, and postglottic (subglottic in humans) levels. ResultsBrachial arches were observed at E13. At E17, immature structures of the larynx, including skeletal muscle, cartilage, and the lumen were identifiable. Chondrification and muscle formation were clearly seen by E19. The muscular and cartilagenous components of the larynx were well established by E21. During the span between birth and adult maturation, the size of the larynx increased from a height of 1.10 mm to 2.90 mm, and from a width of 1.80 mm to 5.40 mm, and from a length of 1.38 mm to 4.77 mm in the stained section. Although developed at E21, the laryngeal structures continued to grow by approximately 30%. ConclusionRat laryngeal development parallels that in mice and humans. In the rat, at E17 immature structures of the larynx are identifiable, they are well developed at birth and grow by approximately 30% into adulthood. Understanding the chronology and morphology of the embryogenesis of the rat laryngeal musculature is essential and will allow for further evaluation of the embryologic innervation of these muscles. Level of EvidenceN/A. Laryngoscope, 123:3093-3098, 2013

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available