4.5 Article

Safety Evaluation of a Sinus Surfactant in an Explant-Based Cytotoxicity Assay

Journal

LARYNGOSCOPE
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages 369-372

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/lary.24255

Keywords

Chronic rhinosinusitis; sinus surfactant; cytotoxicity; human sinonasal explants; biofilm

Funding

  1. University of Adelaide
  2. European Rhinologic Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives/HypothesisBiofilms are associated with clinical relapse following surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. Encased bacteria are protected from innate immunity and antimicrobial therapy. Surfactants can disperse the biofilm into its planktonic phenotype so that traditional treatments may be effective. The aim of this study was to assess a surfactant for its cytotoxicity profile. Study DesignIn vitro explant-based cytotoxicity study. MethodsSinonasal mucosa harvested from patients undergoing sinus surgery was tested using an air-liquid interface explant system. Surfactant at 1x, 2x, and 3x manufacturer's recommended concentrations were compared to control (saline) and Zinc Sulphate (ZnSO4), a known cytotoxic agent. Culture supernatant was analyzed for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as a marker of cellular toxicity. After 7 days, specimens were imaged using structured histopathology and scanning electron microscopy. ResultsApplication of surfactant at 1x concentration did not elicit an elevation in LDH, whereas ZnSO4 caused a significant rise 1 day after application. Specimens tested with a 2x and 3x surfactant demonstrated LDH rises 4 days and 2 days after application, respectively. Mucosa tested with the 1x surfactant and control demonstrated intact cellular structures on histopathology and preserved cilial ultrastructure on SEM. In ZnSO4-treated specimens, marked cellular degradation and ciliary denudation occurred. ConclusionThe surfactant does not appear to elicit cellular toxicity using an in vitro explant model at the manufacturer's recommended concentration. At higher concentrations, there may be dose-related toxicity that requires further investigation. In vivo testing is required to prove its efficacy in the treatment of recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis. Level of EvidenceN/A. Laryngoscope, 124:369-372, 2014

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available