4.5 Article

Expression of COX-2 and NMDA Receptor Genes at the Cochlea and Midbrain in Salicylate-Induced Tinnitus

Journal

LARYNGOSCOPE
Volume 121, Issue 2, Pages 361-364

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lary.21283

Keywords

Tinnitus; salicylate; COX-2 gene; NMDA receptor gene; cochlea; midbrain

Funding

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC-95-231693-B-126-008]
  2. Taichung Veterans General Hospital and Providence University, Taichung, Taiwan [TCVGH-PU988104]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective/Hypothesis: The expression of the genes for cyclooxygenase (COX) and NMDA receptor (NR) has seldom been reported in tinnitus. We hypothesized that expression of COX-2 and NR was altered in the cochlea and midbrain in salicylate-induced tinnitus. Study Design: Experimental study on mice. Methods: We evaluated the tinnitus score and mRNA expression levels of COX-2 and NR subtype 2B (NR2B) in the cochlea and midbrain in response to intraperitoneal injections of salicylate for 4 days. Results: At day 4 of tinnitus induction, the mean weights of the whole body and midbrain did not change greatly in both control and salicylate groups. The tinnitus score was not elevated from day 1 to day 4 in the control group, but increased day by day in the salicylate group. The mRNA expression level of COX-2 decreased slightly in the salicylate group in the cochlea (1.1 +/- 0.33 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.49, P = .0752) and in the midbrain (0.9 +/- 0.10 versus 1.0 +/- 0.35, P = .0489). Inversely, the expression levels of the NR2B gene increased moderately in the salicylate group in the cochlea (3.7 +/- 0.47 versus 2.3 +/- 1.13, P < 0.0001) and in the midbrain (1.6 +/- 0.64 versus 1.0 +/- 0.44, P = .0007). Conclusions: Salicylate induced tinnitus and altered the expression of the COX-2 and NR2B genes in the cochlea and midbrain of mice. These findings might contribute to further understanding of pathophysiology and therapy of tinnitus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available