4.5 Article

Optical Coherence Tomography Allows for the Reliable Identification of Laryngeal Epithelial Dysplasia and for Precise Biopsy: A Clinicopathological Study of 61 Patients Undergoing Microlaryngoscopy

Journal

LARYNGOSCOPE
Volume 120, Issue 10, Pages 1964-1970

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lary.21057

Keywords

Optical coherence tomography; larynx; dysplasia; sensitivity; specificity; premalignant lesion; time domain optical coherence tomography; spectral domain optical coherence tomography

Funding

  1. DFG [Transregio 37]
  2. Local government of Schleswig-Holstein, Germany [HWT 2007-14 H]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives/Hypothesis: A newly developed microscope-based spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) device and an endoscope-based time-domain OCT (TD-OCT) were used to assess the inter-rater reliability, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of benign and dysplastic laryngeal epithelial lesions. Study Design: Prospective study. Methods: OCT during microlaryngoscopy was done on 35 patients with an endoscope-based TD-OCT, and on 26 patients by an SD-OCT system integrated into an operating microscope. Biopsies were taken from microscopically suspicious lesions allowing comparative study of OCT images and histology. Results: Thickness of the epithelium was seen to be the main criterion for degree of dysplasia. The inter-rater reliability for two observers was found to be kappa 0.74 (P <.001) for OCT. OCT provided test outcomes for differentiation between benign laryngeal lesions and dysplasia/CIS with sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 89%, PPV of 85%, NPV of 91%, and predictive accuracy of 88%. However, because of the limited penetration depth of the laser light primarily in hyperkeratotic lesions (thickness above 1.5 mm), the basal cell layer was no longer visible, precluding reliable assessment of such lesions. Conclusions: OCT allows for a fairly accurate assessment of benign and dysplastic laryngeal epithelial lesion and greatly facilitates the taking of precise biopsies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available