4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Real-Time Tracking of Vocal Fold Injections With Optical Coherence Tomography

Journal

LARYNGOSCOPE
Volume 119, Issue 11, Pages 2182-2186

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/lary.20654

Keywords

Optical coherence tomography; larynx; glottis; vocal fold; vocal fold injection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives/Hypothesis: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a promising new imaging modality that can help discern the layered microstructure of vocal folds. In the future, subepithelial injections of implants will improve vocal fold pliability where there is stiffness of phonatory mucosa. Using OCT both to delineate the depth of subepithelial injections real-time and to serially image the implant over time would be valuable, and has not been demonstrated previously. Study Design: Ex vivo study using excised calf larynges and survival study using canines in vivo. Methods: An investigation was done employing real-time OCT imaging of subepithelial injection pulses into phonatory mucosa of four calf larynges ex vivo to track the presence of subepithelial implants in phonatory mucosa in a survival study using an in vivo canine model. Results: OCT readily identified polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based hydrogel in the subepithelial plane in both the ex vivo calf study and the in vivo canine study. Ex vivo calf images correlated with histological specimens obtained immediately postinjection. Images obtained in this study provide confirmation of the hydrogel injection depth in real time, and allow for the implant to be tracked during a canine survival study. Conclusions: OCT can confirm subepithelial placement of hydrogel implant in the vocal fold with sufficient resolution to provide instantaneous feedback of an injection pulse. Survival studies in an in vivo canine model indicate that OCT can potentially be helpful in monitoring rheologically appropriate implants within the superficial lamina propria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available