4.2 Article

Comparison between luminescence and radiocarbon dating of late Quaternary loess from the Ili Basin in Central Asia

Journal

QUATERNARY GEOCHRONOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue -, Pages 405-410

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2015.01.012

Keywords

OSL chronology; Radiocarbon age underestimation; Loess in the Ili Basin; Central Asia

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB955904]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41290250, 41172166]
  3. Institute of Earth Environment of Chinese Academy of Sciences [ZZBS1301]
  4. Scientific and Technological Innovation Team of Chinese Academy of Sciences [CAS Renzi [2013]17]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dust depositions are critical archives for understanding interior aridification and westerly climatic changes in Central Asia. Accurate and reliable dating of loess is very important for interpreting and correlating environmental records. There remains a disparity between luminescence ages and radiocarbon dating of late Quaternary loess from the Ili Basin in Central Asia. In this study, we establish a closely spaced quartz optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) chronology for the 20.5-m-thick Nilka loess section in the Ili Basin. Based on OSL ages, two intervals of higher mass accumulation rate occurred at 49-43 ka and 24-14 ka. We further compare these OSL ages with 23 accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) C-14 ages of bulk organic matter. The results indicate that the OSL and radiocarbon ages agree well for ages younger than ca. 25 C-14 cal ka BP. However, beyond 30 cal ka BP, there is no consistent increase in AMS C-14 age with depth, while the OSL ages continue to increase. These differences confirm the observation that the AMS C-14 ages obtained using conventional acid-base-acid (ABA) pretreatment are severely underestimated in other terrestrial deposits in Central Asia, which could be due to 2-4% modern carbon contamination. However, OSL dating is applicable for constructing an accurate chronology beyond 30 cal ka BP. We suggest caution when interpreting paleoenvironmental changes based on radiocarbon ages older than 25 cal ka BP. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available