4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Atomistic Study of Zwitterionic Peptoid Antifouling Brushes

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 1483-1494

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01939

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. SFI/HEA Irish Centre for High End Computing (ICHEC)
  2. EPSRC UK [EP/P026265/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/P026265/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we study the molecular behavior and hydration properties of a set of zwitterionic peptoid brushes, grafted on a rutile surface, that has been previously reported to exhibit excellent resistance against protein adsorption and cell attachment. Peptoids are novel poly(N-substituted glycine) peptide mimics with the side chains attached to amide nitrogens. They constitute a unique model polymer system because hundreds of side chains have been demonstrated, and the exact chain length and sequence order of the residues/monomers may be specified in experiments. In this report, we vary the brush grafting density as well as the side chain/polymer molecular volume. We include in our study polysarcosine as an uncharged comparison with a small polymer chain cross-section. Sarcosine is the simplest peptoid residue with only a nominally hydrophobic methyl group as side chain, but is also reported to exhibit high antifouling performance. Overall, we show in detail how molecular volume and hydration effects are intertwined in a zwitterionic polymer brush. For example, the zwitterionic design significantly promotes extended chain conformations and could actually lower the overall electrostatic potential. Some properties promoted by the balanced charges, such as chain flexibility and hydration, increase more prominently at low to intermediate chain densities. These and other observations should provide insight on the molecular behavior of peptoids and inform the design of zwitterionic antifouling polymer brushes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available