4.4 Review

In silico ADME/T modelling for rational drug design

Journal

QUARTERLY REVIEWS OF BIOPHYSICS
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 488-515

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0033583515000190

Keywords

ADME/T; Drug Design; Pharmacokinetics; Predictive Toxicology; QSAR

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21210003, 81230076, 81430084]
  2. Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China [2012AA020308, 2014AA01A302]
  3. National Science and Technology Major Project 'Key New Drug Creation and Manufacturing Program' [2014ZX09507002-005-012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent decades, in silico absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion (ADME), and toxicity (T) modelling as a tool for rational drug design has received considerable attention from pharmaceutical scientists, and various ADME/T-related prediction models have been reported. The high-throughput and low-cost nature of these models permits a more streamlined drug development process in which the identification of hits or their structural optimization can be guided based on a parallel investigation of bioavailability and safety, along with activity. However, the effectiveness of these tools is highly dependent on their capacity to cope with needs at different stages, e.g. their use in candidate selection has been limited due to their lack of the required predictability. For some events or endpoints involving more complex mechanisms, the current in silico approaches still need further improvement. In this review, we will briefly introduce the development of in silico models for some physicochemical parameters, ADME properties and toxicity evaluation, with an emphasis on the modelling approaches thereof, their application in drug discovery, and the potential merits or deficiencies of these models. Finally, the outlook for future ADME/T modelling based on big data analysis and systems sciences will be discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available