4.6 Article

Thickness Dependence of Ice Removal Stress for a Polydimethylsiloxane Nanocomposite: Sylgard 184

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 30, Issue 43, Pages 12819-12826

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la5030444

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-0802452, DMR-1206259]
  2. Division Of Materials Research
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1206259] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Minimizing adhesion of ice has been the subject of extensive studies because of importance to applications such aircraft wings, spacecraft, and power transmission wires. A growing interest concerns coatings for wind turbine blades and refrigeration. Herein, a new laboratory test was employed to obtain the thickness dependence of ice adhesion for Sylgard 184a filled polydimethylsiloxane elastomer. A correlation between ice adhesion and coating thickness (t) was found that follows a relationship developed by Kendall over 40 years ago for removal of a rigid object from an elastomer. With a 0.05 mm/s probe speed a nearly linear relationship between peak removal stress (P-s) and 1/t(1/2) was obtained with P-s similar to 460 kPa for an 18 mu m coating, decreasing to similar to 120 kPa for 533 mu m. Preliminary results suggest that below similar to 10 mu m Ps departs from the 1/t(1/2) correlation while above similar to 500 mu m a limiting value for P-s may be reached. We previously reported that probe speed has negligible effect on the glassy polymer PMMA. In contrast, probe speed is identified as an important variable for testing ice release on elastomeric Sylgard 184 coatings. While work of adhesion, which is related to surface free energy, is recognized as an important factor that can affect ice release, the results reported herein show that coating thickness can override this single parameter for elastomeric substrates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available