4.6 Article

Quantitative Assessment of the Accuracy of the Poisson-Boltzmann Cell Model for Salty Suspensions

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 30, Issue 23, Pages 6721-6729

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la501265k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CALMIP [p1114]
  2. GENCI (IDRIS/CINES/TGCC) [x2013097003, x2014097003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cell model is a ubiquitous, fast, and relatively easily implemented model used to estimate the osmotic pressure of a colloidal dispersion. It has been shown to yield accurate approximations of the pressure in dispersions with a low salt content. It is generally accepted that it performs well when long-ranged interactions are involved and the structure of the dispersion is solidlike. The aim of the present work is to determine quantitatively the error committed by assuming the pressure computed with the cell model is the real osmotic pressure of a dispersion. To this end, cell model pressures are compared to a correct estimation of the actual pressures obtained from Poisson-Boltzmann Brownian dynamics simulations including many-body electrostatics and the thermal motion of the colloids. The comparison is performed for various colloidal sizes and charges, salt contents, and volume fractions. It is demonstrated that the accuracy of the cell model predictions is a function of only the average intercolloid distance scaled by Debye's length kappa(d) over bar and the normalized colloidal charge. The cell model is accurate for kappa(d) over bar < 1 and not reliable for kappa<(d)over bar> > 5 independently of the colloidal charge. In the 1 < kappa<(d)over bar> < 5 range, covering a wide set of experimental conditions, the colloidal surface charge has a large influence on the error associated with the cell approximation. The results presented in this article should provide a useful reference to determine a priori if the cell model can be expected to predict accurately an equation of state for a given set of physicochemical parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available