4.6 Article

Densification and Depression in Glass Transition Temperature in Polystyrene Thin Films

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 30, Issue 39, Pages 11599-11608

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la501639z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India through INSPIRE Faculty Award [IFA13-PH-79]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ellipsometry and X-ray reflectivity were used to characterize the mass density and the glass transition temperature of supported polystyrene (PS) thin films as a function of their thickness. By measuring the critical wave vector (q(c)) on the plateau of total external reflection, we evidence that PS films get denser in a confined state when the film thickness is below 50 nm. Refractive indices (n) and electron density profiles measurements confirm this statement. The density of a 6 nm (0.4 gyration radius, R-g) thick film is 30% greater than that of a 150 nm (10R(g)) film. A depression of 25 degrees C in glass transition temperature (T-g) was revealed as the film thickness is reduced. In the context of the free volume theory, this result seems to be in apparent contradiction with the fact that thinner films are denser. However, as the thermal expansion of thinner films is found to be greater than the one of thicker films, the increase in free volume is larger for thin films when temperature is raised. Therefore, the free volume reaches a critical value at a lower T-g for thinner films. This critical value corresponds to the onset of large cooperative movements of polymer chains. The link between the densification of ultrathin films and the drop in their T-g is thus reconciled. We finally show that at their respective T-g(h) all films exhibit a critical mass density of about 1.05 g/cm(3) whatever their thickness. The thickness dependent thermal expansion related to the free volume is consequently a key factor to understand the drop in the T-g of ultrathin films.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available