4.6 Article

Effect of Pore Structure of Nanometer Scale Porous Films on the Measured Elastic Modulus

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 29, Issue 38, Pages 12025-12035

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la402383g

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The impact of pore structure of nanoporous films on the measured elastic modulus is demonstrated for silica-based nanoporous low-k films that are fabricated using an alternative manufacturing sequence which allows a separate control of porosity and matrix properties. For this purpose, different experimental techniques for measuring the elastic properties were compared, including nanoindentation, laser-induced surface acoustic wave spectroscopy (LAwave), and ellipsometric porosimetry (EP). The link between the elastic response of these nanoporous materials and their internal pore structure was investigated using positronium annihilation lifetime spectroscopy (PALS), EP, and diffusion experiments. It is shown that the absolute value of the Berkovich indentation modulus is very sensitive to the local pore structure and stiffness of the substrate and can be influenced by densification and/or anisotropic elasticity upon indentation, while on the other hand spherical indentation results are less sensitive to the local pore structure. The comparison of Berkovich and spherical indentation results combined with finite element simulations can potentially reveal changes in the internal structure of the film. For nanoporous films with porosity above the percolation threshold, the elastic modulus results obtained with LAwave and EP agree very well with spherical indentation results. On the other hand, below the percolation threshold, the elastic modulus values determined by these techniques deviate from the spherical indentation results. This was explained in terms of specific technique related effects that appear to be sensitive to the specific arrangement and morphology of the pores.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available