4.6 Article

Adhesion Force between Cyclopentane Hydrate and Mineral Surfaces

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 29, Issue 50, Pages 15551-15557

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la403489q

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering (DOE-BES) [DE-FG02-05ER46242]
  2. Renewable Energy Materials Research Science and Engineering Center's (REMRSEC) Research Experience for Undergraduates (NSF-REU) program at the Colorado School of Mines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clathrate hydrate adhesion forces play a critical role in describing aggregation and deposition behavior in conventional energy production and transportation. This manuscript uses a unique micromechanical force apparatus to measure the adhesion force between cyclopentane hydrate and heterogeneous quartz and calcite substrates. The latter substrates represent models for coproduced sand and scale often present during conventional energy production and transportation. Micromechanical adhesion force data indicate that clathrate hydrate adhesive forces are 5-10X larger for calcite and quartz minerals than stainless steel. Adhesive forces further increased by 3-15X when increasing surface contact time from 10 to 30 s. In some cases, liquid water from within the hydrate shell contacted the mineral surface and rapidly converted to clathrate hydrate. Further measurements on mineral surfaces with physical control of surface roughness showed a nonlinear dependence of water wetting angle on surface roughness. Existing adhesive force theory correctly predicted the dependence of clathrate hydrate adhesive force on calcite wettability, but did not accurately capture the dependence on quartz wettability. This comparison suggests that the substrate surface may not be inert, and may contribute positively to the strength of the capillary bridge formed between hydrate particles and solid surfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available