4.6 Article

Importance of Loading and Unloading Procedures for Gecko-Inspired Controllable Adhesives

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 29, Issue 34, Pages 10881-10890

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la400835n

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies from the U.S. Army Research Office [W911NF-09-0001]
  2. NSF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The importance of loading and unloading procedures has been shown in a variety of different methods for biological dry adhesives, such as the fibers on the feet of the Tokay gecko, but; biomimetic dry adhesives have yet to be explored in a similar manner. To date, little work has systematically varied multiple parameters to discern the influence of the testing procedure, and the effect of the approach angle remains uncertain. In this study, a synthetic adhesive is moved in 13 individual approach and retraction angles relative to a flat substrate as well as 9 different shear lengths to discern how loading and unloading procedures influence the preload, adhesion, and shear/friction forces supported. The synthetic adhesive composed of vertical 10 mu m diameter semicircular poly(dimethylsiloxane) fibers, is tested against a 4 mm diameter flat glass puck on a home-built microtribometer using both vertical approach and retraction tests and angled approach and retraction tests. The results show that:near maximum adhesion and friction can be obtained for most approach and retraction angles provided that a sufficient shear length is performed. The results also show that the reaction forces during adhesive placement can be significantly reduced by using specific approach angles, the vertical fibers in a 38-fold increase in the ratio of adhesion force to preload force mu' when compared to that when :using a vertical; approach. These results can be of use to those current researching gecko-inspired adhesives When designing their testing procedures and control algorithms for climbing and perching robots.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available