4.6 Article

Water Collection Behavior and Hanging Ability of Bioinspired Fiber

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 28, Issue 10, Pages 4737-4743

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la204682j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Fund for Fundamental Key Project [2010CB934700]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20973018, 21004002]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [YWF-10-01-C10, YWF-11-02-045, YWF-10-01-B16]
  4. Ministry of Education of China [20101102110035]
  5. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20111102120049, 20111102120050]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since the water-collecting ability of the wetted cribellate spider capture silk is the result of a unique fiber structure, bioinspired fibers have been researched significantly so as to expose a new water-acquiring route in fogging-collection projects. However, the design of the geometry of bioinspired fiber is related to the ability of hanging drops, which has not been investigated in depth so far. Here, we fabricate bioinspired fibers to investigate the water collection behavior and the influence of geometry (i.e., periodicity of spindle knot) on the hanging-drop ability. We especially discuss water collection related to the periodicity of geometry on the bioinspired fiber. We reveal the length of the three phase contact line (TCL) at threshold conditions in conjunction with the maximal volume of a hanging drop at different modes. The study demonstrates that the geometrical structure of bioinspired fiber induces much stronger water hanging ability than that of uniform fiber, attributed to such special geometry that offers effectively an increasing TCL length or limits the contact length to be shorted. In addition, the geometry also improves the fog-collection efficiency by controlling tiny water drops to be collected in the large water drops at a given location.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available