4.6 Article

Erosion Resistance of Bionic Functional Surfaces Inspired from Desert Scorpions

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 2914-2921

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la203942r

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51175220]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20100061110023]
  3. Scientific and Technological Development Project of Jilin Province [20090340, 20111808]
  4. Jilin University [200905016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a bionic method is presented to improve the erosion resistance of machine components. Desert scorpion (Androctonus australis) is a typical animal living in sandy deserts, and may face erosive action of blowing sand at a high speed. Based on the idea of bionics and biologic experimental techniques, the mechanisms of the sand erosion resistance of desert scorpion were investigated. Results showed that the desert scorpions used special microtextures such as bumps and grooves to construct the functional surfaces to achieve the erosion resistance. In order to understand the erosion resistance mechanisms of such functional surfaces, the combination of computational and experimental research were carried out in this paper. The Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method was applied to predict the erosion performance of the bionic functional surfaces. The result demonstrated that the microtextured surfaces exhibited better erosion resistance than the smooth surfaces. The further erosion tests indicated that the groove surfaces exhibited better erosion performance at 30 injection angle. In order to determine the effect of the groove dimensions on the erosion resistance, regression analysis of orthogonal multinomials was also performed under a certain erosion condition, and the regression equation between the erosion rate and groove distance, width, and height was established.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available