4.6 Article

Microstructure-Dependent Conformal Atomic Layer Deposition on 3D Nanotopography

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 28, Issue 45, Pages 15809-15815

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la302391u

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [11002124, 11090333]
  2. Science Foundation of Chinese University [2011QNA4038]
  3. Scientific Research Fund of Zhejiang Provincial Education Department [Z200906194]
  4. Science and Technology Innovative Research Team of Zhejiang Province [2009R50010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The capability of atomic layer deposition (ALD) to coat conformally complex 3D nanotopography has been examined by depositing amorphous, polycrystalline, and single crystal TiO2 films over SnO2 nanowires (NWs). Structural characterizations reveal a strong correlation between the surface morphology and the microstructures of ALD films. Conformal growth can only be rigorously achieved in amorphous phase with circular sectors developed at sharp asperities. Morphology evolution convincingly demonstrates the principle of ALD, i.e, sequential and self-limiting surface reactions result in smooth and conformal films. Orientation dependent growth and surface reconstruction generally lead to nonconformal coating in polycrystalline and single-crystal films. Especially, an octagonal single-crystal TiO2 shell was derived from a rectangular SnO2 NW core, which was the consequence of both self-limited growth kinetics and surface reconstruction. Models were proposed to explain the conformality of ALD deposition over 3D nanostructures by taking account of the underlying microstructures. Besides the surface morphologies, the microstructures also have significant consequence to the surface electronic states, characterized by the broad band photoluminescence. The comparison study suggests that ALD process is determined by the interplay of both thermodynamic and kinetic factors

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available