4.6 Article

Drying Dip-Coated Colloidal Films

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 200-208

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la203549g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ANR [ANR-BLAN06-3-144450]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the results from a small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) study of lateral drying in thin films. The films, initially 10 mu m thick, are cast by dip-coating a mica sheet in an aqueous silica dispersion (particle radius 8 nm, volume fraction phi(s) = 0.14). During evaporation, a drying front sweeps across the film. An X-ray beam is focused on a selected spot of the film, and SAXS patterns are recorded at regular time intervals. As the film evaporates, SAXS spectra measure the ordering of particles, their volume fraction, the film thickness, and the water content, and a video camera images the solid regions of the film, recognized through their scattering of light. We find that the colloidal dispersion is first concentrated to phi(s) = 0.3, where the silica particles begin to jam under the effect of their repulsive interactions. Then the particles aggregate until they form a cohesive wet solid at phi(s) = 0.68 +/- 0.02. Further evaporation from the wet solid leads to evacuation of water from pores of the film but leaves a residual water fraction phi(w) = 0.16. The whole drying process is completed within 3 min. An important finding is that, in any spot (away from boundaries), the number of particles is conserved throughout this drying process, leading to the formation of a homogeneous deposit. This implies that no flow of particles occurs in our films during drying, a behavior distinct to that encountered in the iconic coffee-stain drying. It is argued that this type of evolution is associated with the formation of a transition region that propagates ahead of the drying front. In this region the gradient of osmotic pressure balances the drag force exerted on the particles by capillary flow toward the liquid solid front.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available