4.6 Article

Wetting of Biopolymer Coatings: Contact Angle Kinetics and Image Analysis Investigation

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 27, Issue 12, Pages 7563-7574

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la2017006

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The surface wetting of five biopolymers, used as coating materials for a plastic film, was monitored over a span of 8 min by means of the optical contact angle technique. Because most of the total variation was observed to occur during the first 60 s, we decided to focus on this curtailed temporal window. Initial contact angle values (theta(0)) ranged from similar to 91 degrees for chitosan to similar to 30 degrees for pullulan. However, the water drop profile began to change immediately following drop deposition for all biocoatings, firming that the concept of water contact angle equilibrium is not applicable to most biopolymers. First, a three-parameter decay equation [theta(t) = theta(0) exp(kt(n))] was fit to the experimental contact angle data to describe the kinetics of the contact angle change for each biocoating. Interestingly, the k constant correlated well with the contact angle evolution rate and the n exponent seemed to be somehow linked to the physicochemical phenomena underlying the overall kinetics process. Second, to achieve a reliable description of droplet evolution, the contact angle (CA) analysis was coupled with image analysis(IA) through a combined geometric/trigonometric approach. Absorption and spreading were the key factors governing the overall mechanism of surface wetting during the 60s analysis, although the individual quantification of both phenomena demonstrated that spreading provided the largest contribution for all biopolymers, with the only exception of gelatin, which showed two quasi-equivalent and counterbalancing effects. The possible correlation between these two phenomena and the topography of the biopolymer surfaces are then discussed on the basis of atomic force microscopy analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available