4.6 Article

Effect of Support Corrugation on Silica Xerogel-Supported Phase-Separated Lipid Bilayers

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages 3713-3717

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la803851b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF NIRT Program [CBET 0506602]
  2. NSF MRSEC Program CPIMA [DMR 0213618]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy
  4. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [W-7405Eng-48, DE-AC52-07NA27344]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lipid bilayers supported by substrates with nanometer-scale surface corrugations hold interest in understanding both nanoparticle-membrane interactions and the challenges of constructing models of cell membranes on surfaces with desirable properties, e.g., porosity. Here, we successfully form a two-phase (gel-fluid) lipid bilayer supported by nanoporous silica xerogel. Surface topology, lateral diffusion coefficient, and lipid density in comparison to mica-supported lipid bilayers were characterized by atomic force microscopy, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), and quantitative fluorescence microscopy, respectively. We found that the two-phase lipid bilayer follows the silica xerogel surface contours. The corrugation imparted on the lipid bilayer results in a lipid density that is twice that on a flat mica surface in the fluid regions. In direct agreement with the doubling of actual bilayer area in a projected area, we find that the lateral diffusion coefficient (D) of fluid lipids on silica xerogel (similar to 1.7 mu m(2)/s) is lower than on mica (similar to 3.9 mu m(2)/s) by both FRAP and FCS techniques. Furthermore, the gel-phase domains on silica xerogel compared to mica were larger and less numerous. Overall, our results suggest the presence of a relatively defect-free continuous two-phase lipid bilayer that penetrates approximately midway into the first layer of similar to 50 nm silica xerogel beads.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available