4.6 Article

Settlement of Ulva zoospores on patterned fluorinated and PEGylated monolayer surfaces

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 503-510

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la702275g

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Various designs for coatings that resist the attachment of marine organisms are based on the concept of ambiguous surfaces that present both hydrophobic and hydrophilic functionalities as surface domains. In order to facilitate the optimal design of such Surfaces, information is needed on the scale of the domains that the settling stages of marine organisms are able to distinguish. Previous experiments showed that Ulva zoospores settle (attach) in high numbers onto fluorinated monolayers compared to PEGylated monolayers. The main aim of the present study was to determine, when zoospores of the green alga Ulva are presented with a choice of fluorinated or PEGylated surfaces, what the minimum dimensions of the two types of surface are that zoospores can detect and consequently settle on. Silicon wafers were chemically modified to produce a pattern of squares containing alternating fluorinated and PEGylated stripes of different widths on either a uniform fluorinated or PEGylated background. Each 1 cm x 1 cm square contained stripes with widths of 500, 200, 100, 50, 20, 5, or 2 mu m as well as ail unpatterned square with a chemistry opposite that of the background. Spores were selective in choosing where to settle, settling at higher densities on fluorinated stripes compared to PEGylated stripes. However, the magnitude of response, and the consequences for settlement on Patterned areas overall, was dependent on both the width of the stripes and the chemistry of the background. The data are discussed in relation to the ability of spores to choose favorable sites for settlement and the implications for the development of novel antifouling coatings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available