4.2 Article

Negative pressure and spallation in graphite targets under nano- and picosecond laser irradiation

Journal

QUANTUM ELECTRONICS
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages 421-425

Publisher

TURPION LTD
DOI: 10.1070/QE2015v045n05ABEH015759

Keywords

laser radiation of picosecond and nanosecond duration; ablation pressure; shock wave; negative pressure; spallation phenomenon; strain rate; ultimate strength; numerical simulation; graphite

Funding

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [12-02-00625, 12-02-00746, 13-02-91057, 14-08-00967, 14-29-06099]
  2. RF President's Grants Council [NSh-451.2014.2, NSh-6614.2014.2]
  3. Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences [13P, 2P]
  4. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) of Germany
  5. programme FP7 EuCARD-2 [312453]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the results of experiments on the spallation phenomena in graphite targets under shock-wave nano- and picosecond irradiation, which have been performed on Kamerton-T (GPI, Moscow, Russia) and PHELIX (GSI, Darmstadt, Germany) laser facilities. In the range of the strain rates of 10(6)-10(7) s(-1), the data on the dynamic mechanical strength of the material at rapure (spallation) have been for the first time obtained. With a maximal strain rate of 1.4 x 10(7) s(-1), the spall strength of 2.1 GPa is obtained, which constitutes 64% of the theoretical ultimate tensile strength of graphite. The effect of spallation is observed not only on the rear side of the target, but also on its irradiated (front) surface. With the use of optical and scanning electron microscopes, the morphology of the front and rear surfaces of the targets is studied. By means of Raman scattering of light, the graphite structure both on the target front surface under laser exposure and on its rear side in the spall zone is investigated. A comparison of the dynamic strength of graphite and synthetic diamond is performed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available