4.6 Article

Molecular dynamics simulations of capillary rise experiments in nanotubes coated with polymer brushes

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 1232-1239

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la7019445

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The capillary filling of a nanotube coated with a polymer brush is studied by molecular dynamics simulations of a coarse-grained model, assuming various conditions for the fluid-wall and fluid-brush interactions. Whereas the fluid is modeled by simple point particles interacting with Lennard-Jones forces, the (end-grafted, fully flexible) polymers that form the brush coating are described by a standard bead-spring model. Our experiments reveal that capillary filling is observed even for walls that would not be wetted by the fluid, provided the polymer brush coating itself wets. Generally, it is found that the capillary rise always proceeds through a t(1/2) law with time t while the underlying molecular mechanism differs for wettable and nonwettable walls. For wettable walls, fluid imbibition is compatible with the Lucas-Washburn mechanism whereby the total influx of matter drops steadily with growing chain length N and the meniscus speed goes through a minimum at intermediate chain lengths. Moreover, because of flow, the polymer brush reorganizes its structure by forming a dense plug of chain segments under the meniscus that follows the meniscus in its motion. When the tube wall does not wet, one observes no meniscus formation for short chains although the fluid seeps through the wet brush. For a brush coating with longer chains, axial segregation between the brush segments and the fluid occurs by a kind of diffusive spreading, reminiscent of invasion percolation transport in a random medium, leading to the formation of a moving meniscus. For even longer chains that reach the tube axis, the rise of a meniscus with vanishing curvature-like imbibition in a porous medium is observed to take place.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available