Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Comparing responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L and EQ VAS in stroke patients
Dominik Golicki et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2015)
Validity of EQ-5D-5L in stroke
Dominik Golicki et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2015)
Quality of life assessed with EQ-5D in patients undergoing glioma surgery: What is the responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference?
Lisa Millgard Sagberg et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2014)
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2013 Update A Report From the American Heart Association
Alan S. Go et al.
CIRCULATION (2013)
Validity and responsiveness of EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) versus Short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) questionnaire in chronic pain
Marko Obradovic et al.
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES (2013)
Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study
M. F. Janssen et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2013)
Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in German stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation
Matthias Hunger et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2012)
Interim Scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: Mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L Value Sets
Ben van Hout et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2012)
Factors Associated With Health-Related Quality of Life After Stroke: A 1-Year Prospective Cohort Study
Beatrix Alguren et al.
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR (2012)
Assessing the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life for Outcome Measurement in Stroke Rehabilitation: Minimal Detectable Change and Clinically Important Difference
Keh-chung Lin et al.
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES (2011)
Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
M. Herdman et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2011)
Exploring the validity of estimating EQ-5D and SF-6D utility values from the health assessment questionnaire in patients with inflammatory arthritis
Mark J. Harrison et al.
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES (2010)
Psychometric comparisons of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale
Keh-Chung Lin et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2010)
Minimal Detectable Change and Clinically Important Difference of the Stroke Impact Scale in Stroke Patients
Keh-chung Lin et al.
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR (2010)
Quality of Life after Stroke: The Importance of a Good Recovery
Francisco Javier Carod-Artal et al.
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES (2009)
Responsiveness and Validity of Three Outcome Measures of Motor Function After Stroke Rehabilitation
Yu-wei Hsieh et al.
STROKE (2009)
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
Dennis Revicki et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
Reliability and validity of the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and a modified scale for testing muscle strength in patients with radial palsy
Tatjana Paternostro-Sluga et al.
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE (2008)
The stroke impact scale 3.0 - Evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version
Francisco Javier Carod-Artal et al.
STROKE (2008)
Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer
A. Simon Pickard et al.
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES (2007)
Sex differences in quality of life in stroke survivors - Data from the tinzaparin in acute ischaemic stroke trial (TAIST)
Laura J. Gray et al.
STROKE (2007)
Factors influencing stroke survivors' quality of life during subacute recovery
DS Nichols-Larsen et al.
STROKE (2005)
Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study
T Platz et al.
CLINICAL REHABILITATION (2005)
Responsiveness of generic health-related quality of life measures in stroke
A Simon Pickard et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2005)
Physical and social functioning after stroke - Comparison of the Stroke Impact Scale and Short Form-36
SM Lai et al.
STROKE (2003)
Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the motor component of the Functional Independence Measure in stroke the impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness
D Wallace et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2002)
Estimating an EQ-5D population value set: the case of Japan
A Tsuchiya et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2002)
A review of health-related quality-of-life measures in stroke
BA Golomb et al.
PHARMACOECONOMICS (2001)
The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures
ME Cohen et al.
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION (2000)
Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations
JA Husted et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2000)
Share Paper
