4.7 Article

Seasonal movement and groundwater flow mechanism in an unsaturated saprolitic hillslope

Journal

LANDSLIDES
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 455-467

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-012-0343-7

Keywords

Saprolitic hillslope; Seasonal behaviour; Matric suction; Net normal stress; Slope ratcheting; Groundwater flow mechanism

Funding

  1. Geotechnical Engineering Office, Civil Engineering and Development Department of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
  2. Research Grants Council of the Government of the Hong Kong SAR [HKUST9/CRF/09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Numerous field monitoring programs have been conducted to investigate the performance of an unsaturated soil slope subjected to rainfalls in wet seasons. Most case histories focus on the response of matric suction, which is one of the two stress-state variables governing unsaturated soil behaviour. However, effects due to another variable, net normal stress, are often ignored. Also, slope performance under alternative wet and dry seasons is rarely reported and analysed. In this study, a saprolitic hillslope situated in Hong Kong was instrumented heavily to investigate its seasonal movement due to changes of the two variables and also groundwater flow mechanism. Two-year seasonal variations of matric suction and net normal stress were monitored by tensiometers together with heat dissipation matric water potential sensors and earth pressure cells, respectively. During heavy rainstorms in wet season, there was a substantial recharge of the main groundwater table, causing a significant increase of positive pore-water pressure in deeper depths. Rupture surface likely developed at depths between 5.5 and 6 m, hence resulting in a deep-seated mode of downslope movement. The downslope movement resulted in a peak increase of horizontal stress. In dry seasons, matric suction of up to 190 kPa was recorded, and the associated soil shrinkage led to substantial upslope rebounds. The stress built up in wet seasons hence reduced. After monitoring period of 2 years, downslope ratcheting is identified. Up to 40 % of the downslope displacements were recovered by the upslope rebounds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available