Journal
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 877-890Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-011-9616-0
Keywords
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI); Kibale National Park; Forest fragments; Land cover change; Continuous analyses; Reforestation; Regrowth
Funding
- National Science Foundation [0352008, EF-0553768]
- University of California, Santa Barbara
- State of California
- Canada Research Chairs Program
- National Geographic Society
- NSERC
- Uganda National Council for Science and Technology
- Uganda Wildlife Authority
- Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
- Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0352008] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
- Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
- Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1114977] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Kibale National Park, within the Albertine Rift, is known for its rich biodiversity. High human population density and agricultural conversion in the surrounding landscape have created enormous resource pressure on forest fragments outside the park. Kibale presents a complex protected forest landscape comprising intact forest inside the park, logged areas inside the park, a game corridor with degraded forest, and forest fragments in the landscape surrounding the park. To explore the effect of these different levels of forest management and protection over time, we assessed forest change over the previous three decades, using both discrete and continuous data analyses of satellite imagery. Park boundaries have remained fairly intact and forest cover has been maintained or increased inside the park, while there has been a high level of deforestation in the landscape surrounding the park. While absolute changes in land cover are important changes in vegetation productivity, within land cover classes are often more telling of longer term changes and future directions of change. The park has lower Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) values than the forest fragments outside the park and the formerly logged area-probably due to forest regeneration and early succession stage. The corridor region has lower productivity, which is surprising given this is also a newer regrowth region and so should be similar to the logged and forest fragments. Overall, concern can be raised for the future trajectory of this park. Although forest cover has been maintained, forest health may be an issue, which for future management, climate change, biodiversity, and increased human pressure may signify troubling signs.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available