4.7 Article

The impact of thematic resolution on the patch-mosaic model of natural landscapes

Journal

LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 15-23

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-008-9310-z

Keywords

Geocover; Landscape metrics; MAUP; Patch-mosaic model; Scale; Thematic resolution

Funding

  1. Alberta Ingenuity Fund (AIF)
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. University of Calgary
  4. Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute (ABMI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We argue that thematic resolution, i.e., the level of categorical detail of a thematic map expressed by the number of classes included in the map legend, is an inherent component of the scale at which a landscape is analyzed. Changing the number of classes can change the configuration of the patch mosaic as much as changing the grain does. We address recent calls in this and other journals to deepen research in this topic. In particular, we report how thematic resolution affects the patchiness of mosaics representing natural landscapes, which have seldom been studied in this respect. We selected seven 50 x 50 km landscapes within national parks, each representative of a world biome. We applied an object-based unsupervised classification to Landsat TM imagery of these landscapes using increasing numbers of classes, between 2 and 50, and derived curves of mean patch size and patch density for each site. Our results are consistent with previous findings in that the patchiness of output mosaics increases monotonically with increasing thematic resolution, with a higher rate of increase up to eight classes that declines until it becomes roughly constant for more than 16 classes. However, this constant rate of increase is still considerable, meaning that, at least for natural landscapes, there is no threshold beyond which the patch-mosaic model is independent of the conceptual filter applied. This dependence on human fiat calls for re-thinking the patch-mosaic paradigm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available