4.7 Article

Plant traits link people's plant preferences to the composition of their gardens

Journal

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
Volume 105, Issue 1-2, Pages 34-42

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.023

Keywords

Landscape preference; Native plants; Horticulture; Biodiversity; Plant traits

Funding

  1. Australian Postgraduate Award scholarship
  2. University of Melbourne

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gardens are ubiquitous in western cities, comprising up to a third of the total urban area and often containing a majority of the vegetation present. Gardens are the cumulative result of many individual plant choices, yet we know relatively little about the role of preference in these choices. We investigated peoples' preference for different garden plants and reasons for plant choices using a postal questionnaire (n = 224) containing 30 colour photos of garden plants and questions about gardening behaviour. Preferences were compared with the plants growing in the gardens of 48 randomly selected respondents. Objectively measured plant traits were used to relate preferences to the plants growing in people's gardens. Significant relationships were found between survey responses and both the traits and taxonomy of plants growing in respondent gardens. The results also show that people's preferences are very diverse, and that these preferences were related both to aesthetic traits such as flower size, leaf width and foliage colour, and non-visual traits such as nativeness and drought tolerance. Together these findings provide evidence that garden floras have responded to their social environment, and suggests that the very high levels of diversity observed in gardens can in part be attributed to the heterogeneity observed in this social environment. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available