4.4 Article

Differences in amounts of pools and riffles between upper and lower reaches of a fully sedimented dam in a mountain gravel-bed river

Journal

LANDSCAPE AND ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 145-155

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s11355-011-0156-1

Keywords

Sediment storage; Bed topography; Cobbles; Boulders; Bedrock outcrops; Water surface slope

Funding

  1. Council of Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  2. [196360224]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To understand the extent of changes in the habitat structure of macroinvertebrates due to channel degradation, the amount of pools and riffles and bed materials were determined in upper and lower reaches of a fully sedimented dam in a mountain gravel-bed river. Pools occurred more frequently and individual pools were longer in the lower reach than in the upper reaches; the total length of pools in the former was four times than in the latter. In contrast, individual riffles in the upper reaches were longer than and the total length double that in the lower reach. The main bed materials in the upper reaches were moderate-sized cobbles and boulders (diameter 10-40 cm), which generated moderately steep and long riffles. In the lower reach, these materials were scarce and the main bed materials were large boulders (> 50 cm) and bedrock, which generated steep and short riffles; finer materials (< 10 cm) dominated in pools and runs. The reduced total length of riffles in the lower reach was partly associated with the steepening of individual riffles, which may be due to the shortage of moderate-sized cobbles and boulders. Macroinvertebrate biomass at reach scale, which was estimated based on the total lengths of pools and riffles, was more than two to four times in the upper reaches than in the lower reach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available