4.6 Article

MODELLING THE IMPACTS OF WILDFIRE ON ASH THICKNESS IN A SHORT-TERM PERIOD

Journal

LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 180-192

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2195

Keywords

ash; soil protection; thickness; fire severity; spatial predictor; spatial autocorrelation; ash mobility

Funding

  1. Lithuanian Research Council [MIP-048/2011]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the HYDFIRE project [CGL2010-21670-C02-01]
  3. FUEGORED (Spanish Network of Forest Fire Effects on Soils)
  4. Comissionat per a Universitats i Recerca del DIUE de la Generalitat de Catalunya

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ash can provide valuable soil protection. However, ash is also very mobile, and soil protection patterns can be quickly changed, favouring the protection of some areas and exposing others with implications for soil erosion. In this research, the effects of a high severity wildfire on ash thickness were studied, 1 and 15 days after the fire. For this evaluation, several interpolation methods were tested to identify the best spatial predictor of ash distribution. The results showed that 1 day after the fire, ash was thinner in high severity areas. Fifteen days after the fire, ash thickness decreased, and the spatial pattern changed. This implies that evaluation of fire severity based on ash thickness must take a place immediately after the fire because it is affected by (re)distribution. There was an increase in the spatial autocorrelation, and ash distribution corresponded to a specific spatial pattern, because of wind (re)distribution. One day after the fire, the most accurate predictor was Inverse to a Weight 3 (IDW3) that detected easily the small-scale variability of ash thickness, and after 15 days, ordinary kriging identified a specific pattern of ash distribution. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available