4.6 Article

MAPPING SENSITIVITY TO LAND DEGRADATION IN EXTREMADURA. SW SPAIN

Journal

LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 129-144

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.884

Keywords

land degradation; desertification; ESA index; extremadura; MEDALUS; validation; Spain

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science
  2. Junta de Extremadura
  3. INTEREG IIIA
  4. EPIMODE [REN2003-08621]
  5. CANOA [CGL-2004-04919-C02-02]
  6. IDEG [PRI06A281]
  7. Dehesa/Montado [SP4.E13]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An assessment of sensitivity to land degradation has been carried out in the Extremadura region, SW Spain, by means of a modelling approach developed by the European Commission funded MEDALUS project (Mediterranean Desertification and Land Use) which identifies Such areas on the basis of all index (Environmentally Sensitive Area index, ESA index) that incorporates data on environmental quality (climate, vegetation, soil) its well as anthropogenic factors (management). Two maps of environmental sensitivity (ES) to degradation with different legend resolution (four and eight classes of sensitivity) have been made and tested by comparing classes of the legends with an extensive number (2690) of true field data gathered from plots distributed all over the study region. Independent variables of validation consisted of nine degradation-related types of data and the method tested the performance of the whole model and the statistical separability among classes of sensitivity, its well its the capability of the variables in delimiting the classes. Results showed a good performance of the whole model to both, the map of four and eighth classes of sensitivity. Separation among classes of sensitivity showed it slightly different behaviour of both maps, identifying transitional classes in the map of eight classes where classification could be improved in terms of the ranges of ESA index Values assigned to the different classes. Copyright (C) 2008 Joint Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available