4.7 Review

Local treatments for metastases of renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review

Journal

LANCET ONCOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages E549-E561

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70235-9

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Pfizer
  2. GlaxoSmithKline
  3. Novartis
  4. Astellas
  5. Roche
  6. Bayer
  7. Imatics
  8. EORTC SURTIME trial [30073]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Local treatment of metastases such as metastasectomy or radiotherapy remains controversial in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. To investigate the benefits and harms of various local treatments, we did a systematic review of all types of comparative studies on local treatment of metastases from renal cell carcinoma in any organ. Interventions included metastasectomy, radiotherapy modalities, and no local treatment. The results suggest that patients treated with complete metastasectomy have better survival and symptom control (including pain relief in bone metastases) than those treated with either incomplete or no metastasectomy. Nevertheless, the available evidence was marred by high risks of bias and confounding across all studies. Although the findings presented here should be interpreted with caution, they and the identified gaps in knowledge should provide guidance for clinicians and researchers, and directions for further research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available