Journal
LANCET ONCOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages 1135-1141Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70257-6
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- AstraZeneca
- Genentech
- Pfizer
- Roche
- Novartis
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background The Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of anastrozole (1 mg) with tamoxifen (20 mg), both given orally every day for 5 years as adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal women with early stage breast cancer In this analysis we assess the long term outcomes after a median follow up of 120 months Methods We used a proportional hazards model to assess the primary endpoint of disease free survival and the secondary endpoints of time to recurrence time to distant recurrence incidence of new contralateral breast cancer overall survival and death with or without recurrence in all randomised patients (anastrozole n=3125 tamoxifen n=3116) and hormone receptor positive patients (anastrozole n=2618 tamoxifen n=2598) After treatment completion we continued to collect data on fractures and serious adverse events in a masked fashion (safety population anastrozole n=3092, tamoxifen n=3094) This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN18233230 Findings Patients were followed up for a median of 120 months (range 0-145) there were 24522 woman years of follow up in the anastrozole group and 23950 woman years in the tamoxifen group In the full study population, there were significant improvements in the anastrozole group compared with the tamoxifen group for disease free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0 91 95% CI 0 83-0 99 p=0 04) time to recurrence (0 84 0 75-0 93 p=0 001) and time to distant recurrence (0 87 0 77-0 99 p=0 03) For hormone receptor positive patients the results were also significantly in favour of the anastrozole group for disease free survival (HR 0 86 95% CI 0 78-0 95 p=0 003), time to recurrence (0 79 0 70-0 89 p=0 0002) and time to distant recurrence (0 85 0 73-0 98, p=0 02) In hormone receptor positive patients absolute differences in time to recurrence between anastrozole and tamoxifen increased over time (2 7% at 5 years and 4 3% at 10 years) and recurrence rates remained significantly lower on anastrozole than tamoxifen after treatment completion (HR 0 81 95% CI 0 67-0 98 p=0 03) although the carryover benefit was smaller after 8 years There was weak evidence of fewer deaths after recurrence with anastrozole compared with tamoxifen treatment in the hormone receptor positive subgroup (HR 0 87 95% CI 0 74-1 02 p=0 09) but there was little difference in overall mortality (0 95,95% CI 0 84-1 06 p=0 4) Fractures were more frequent during active treatment in patients receiving anastrozole than those receiving tamoxifen (451 vs 351 OR 1 33 95% CI 1 15-1 55 p<0 0001) but were similar in the post treatment follow up period (110 vs 112 OR 0 98 95% CI 0 74-1 30 p=0 9) Treatment related serious adverse events were less common in the anastrozole group than the tamoxifen group (223 anastrozole vs 369 tamoxifen OR 0 57 95% CI 0 48-0 69 p<0 0001) but were similar after treatment completion (66 vs 78, OR 0 84,95% CI 0 60-1 19, p=0 3) No differences in non breast cancer causes of death were apparent and the incidence of other cancers was similar between groups (425 vs 431) and continue to be higher with anastrozole for colorectal (66 vs 44) and lung cancer (51 vs 34) and lower for endometrial cancer (six vs 24) melanoma (eight vs 19) and ovarian cancer (17 vs 28) No new safety concerns were reported Interpretation These data confirm the long term superior efficacy and safety of anastrozole over tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone sensitive early breast cancer
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available