4.7 Review

Restoring function after spinal cord injury: towards clinical translation of experimental strategies

Journal

LANCET NEUROLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 1241-1256

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70144-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [FPP216158]
  2. International Spinal Research Trust
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. UK Medical Research Council (SNCF) [G1002055]
  5. International Spinal Research Trust [TR1004_01]
  6. Henry Smith Charity [STR101]
  7. Wings for Life [WFL-GB-020/13]
  8. Rosetrees Trust [JS16/M276]
  9. International Foundation for Research in Paraplegia [P145]
  10. MRC [G1002055] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. International Spinal Research Trust [TRI004_01, STR101, STR108] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Medical Research Council [G1002055] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. Rosetrees Trust [M276] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spinal cord injury is currently incurable and treatment is limited to minimising secondary complications and maximising residual function by rehabilitation. Improved understanding of the pathophysiology of spinal cord injury and the factors that prevent nerve and tissue repair has fuelled a move towards more ambitious experimental treatments aimed at promoting neuroprotection, axonal regeneration, and neuroplasticity. By necessity, these new options are more invasive. However, in view of recent advances in spinal cord injury research and demand from patients, clinicians, and the scientific community to push promising experimental treatments to the dinic, momentum and optimism exist for the translation of candidate experimental treatments to clinical spinal cord injury. The ability to rescue, reactivate, and rewire spinal systems to restore function after spinal cord injury might soon be within reach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available