Journal
LANCET NEUROLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 233-243Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70014-0
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Novartis
- Pfizer
- Baxter
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Lundbeck
- Merz
- Solvay
- Eisai
- Octapharma AG
- Orion Pharma
- UCB
- CSL Behring
- TevaPharma
- Canadian Blood Service
- ZLB Behring
- Behring-Rontgen-Stiftung
- MJ Fox Foundation
- Rentschler
- International Parkinson Fund
- Faber Stiftung
- Movement Disorder Society
- Hector-Stiftung
- Alzheimer Forschung Initiative
- DGSM
- Abbott
- Bayer Healthcare
- Siemens
- Octapharma MG
- Roche
- Sanofi-Aventis
- Biogen-idec
- Merck-Serono
- Bayer-Schering
- Synthon BV
- Jansen Research
- TEVA
- Merck
- Behring-Rontgen Foundation
- Grifols
- Teva Pharmaceuticals
- Octapharma
- DZNE (Germany)
- Fisher Scientific
- Beckman Coulter
- foundation of the state Baden-Wuerttemberg
- Teva Neuroscience
- Eli Lilly
- Genentech
- Forest
- Schwabe
- General Electric Healthcare
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background Three small trials suggest that intravenous immunoglobulin can affect biomarkers and symptoms of mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. We tested the safety, effective dose, and infusion interval of intravenous immunoglobulin in such patients. Methods We did a multicentre, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial at seven sites in the USA and five in Germany. Participants with probable Alzheimer's disease aged 50-85 years were randomly assigned (by a computer-generated randomisation sequence, with block sizes of eight) to infusions every 4 weeks (0.2, 0.5, or 0.8 g intravenous immunoglobulin per kg bodyweight, or placebo) or infusions every 2 weeks (0.1,0.25, or 0.4 g/kg, or placebo). Patients, caregivers, investigators assessing outcomes, and staff at imaging facilities and the clinical research organisation were masked to treatment allocation, but dispensing pharmacists, the statistician, and the person responsible for final PET analyses were not. Treatment was masked with opaque pouches and infusion lines. The primary endpoint was median area under the curve (AUC) of plasma amyloid beta (A beta)(1-40), between the last infusion and the final visit (2 weeks or 4 weeks depending on infusion interval) in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00812565) and controlled-trials.com (ISRCTN64846759). Findings 89 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 58 were enrolled and 55 included in the primary analysis. Median AUC of plasma A beta(1-40) was not significantly different for intravenous immunoglobulin compared with placebo for five of the six intervention groups (-18.0 [range -1347.0 to 1068.5] for 0.2 g/kg, -364.3 [-5834.5 to 1953.5] for 0-5 g/kg, and -351.8 [-1084.0 to 936.5] for 0.8 g/kg every 4 weeks vs -116.3 [-1379.0 to 5266.0] for placebo; and -13.8 [-1729.0 to 307.0] for 0.1 g/kg, and -32-5 [-1102.5 to 451.5] for 0.25 g/kg every 2 weeks vs 159.5 [51.5 to 303.0] for placebo; p>0.05 for all). The difference in median AUC of plasma A beta(1-40) between the 0.4 g/kg every 2 weeks group (47.0 [range -341.0 to 72.5]) and the placebo group was significant (p=0.0216). 25 of 42 (60%) patients in the intervention group versus nine of 14 (64%) receiving placebo had an adverse event. Four of 42 (10%) patients in the intravenous immunoglobulin group versus four of 14 (29%) receiving placebo had a serious adverse event, induding one stroke in the intervention group. Interpretation Intravenous immunoglobulin may have an acceptable safety profile. Our results did not accord with those from previous studies. Longer trials with greater power are needed to assess the cognitive and functional effects of intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available