4.7 Article

Intravenous immunoglobulin for treatment of mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial

Journal

LANCET NEUROLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 233-243

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70014-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim
  2. Novartis
  3. Pfizer
  4. Baxter
  5. GlaxoSmithKline
  6. Lundbeck
  7. Merz
  8. Solvay
  9. Eisai
  10. Octapharma AG
  11. Orion Pharma
  12. UCB
  13. CSL Behring
  14. TevaPharma
  15. Canadian Blood Service
  16. ZLB Behring
  17. Behring-Rontgen-Stiftung
  18. MJ Fox Foundation
  19. Rentschler
  20. International Parkinson Fund
  21. Faber Stiftung
  22. Movement Disorder Society
  23. Hector-Stiftung
  24. Alzheimer Forschung Initiative
  25. DGSM
  26. Abbott
  27. Bayer Healthcare
  28. Siemens
  29. Octapharma MG
  30. Roche
  31. Sanofi-Aventis
  32. Biogen-idec
  33. Merck-Serono
  34. Bayer-Schering
  35. Synthon BV
  36. Jansen Research
  37. TEVA
  38. Merck
  39. Behring-Rontgen Foundation
  40. Grifols
  41. Teva Pharmaceuticals
  42. Octapharma
  43. DZNE (Germany)
  44. Fisher Scientific
  45. Beckman Coulter
  46. foundation of the state Baden-Wuerttemberg
  47. Teva Neuroscience
  48. Eli Lilly
  49. Genentech
  50. Forest
  51. Schwabe
  52. General Electric Healthcare

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Three small trials suggest that intravenous immunoglobulin can affect biomarkers and symptoms of mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. We tested the safety, effective dose, and infusion interval of intravenous immunoglobulin in such patients. Methods We did a multicentre, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial at seven sites in the USA and five in Germany. Participants with probable Alzheimer's disease aged 50-85 years were randomly assigned (by a computer-generated randomisation sequence, with block sizes of eight) to infusions every 4 weeks (0.2, 0.5, or 0.8 g intravenous immunoglobulin per kg bodyweight, or placebo) or infusions every 2 weeks (0.1,0.25, or 0.4 g/kg, or placebo). Patients, caregivers, investigators assessing outcomes, and staff at imaging facilities and the clinical research organisation were masked to treatment allocation, but dispensing pharmacists, the statistician, and the person responsible for final PET analyses were not. Treatment was masked with opaque pouches and infusion lines. The primary endpoint was median area under the curve (AUC) of plasma amyloid beta (A beta)(1-40), between the last infusion and the final visit (2 weeks or 4 weeks depending on infusion interval) in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00812565) and controlled-trials.com (ISRCTN64846759). Findings 89 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 58 were enrolled and 55 included in the primary analysis. Median AUC of plasma A beta(1-40) was not significantly different for intravenous immunoglobulin compared with placebo for five of the six intervention groups (-18.0 [range -1347.0 to 1068.5] for 0.2 g/kg, -364.3 [-5834.5 to 1953.5] for 0-5 g/kg, and -351.8 [-1084.0 to 936.5] for 0.8 g/kg every 4 weeks vs -116.3 [-1379.0 to 5266.0] for placebo; and -13.8 [-1729.0 to 307.0] for 0.1 g/kg, and -32-5 [-1102.5 to 451.5] for 0.25 g/kg every 2 weeks vs 159.5 [51.5 to 303.0] for placebo; p>0.05 for all). The difference in median AUC of plasma A beta(1-40) between the 0.4 g/kg every 2 weeks group (47.0 [range -341.0 to 72.5]) and the placebo group was significant (p=0.0216). 25 of 42 (60%) patients in the intervention group versus nine of 14 (64%) receiving placebo had an adverse event. Four of 42 (10%) patients in the intravenous immunoglobulin group versus four of 14 (29%) receiving placebo had a serious adverse event, induding one stroke in the intervention group. Interpretation Intravenous immunoglobulin may have an acceptable safety profile. Our results did not accord with those from previous studies. Longer trials with greater power are needed to assess the cognitive and functional effects of intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available