4.7 Review

Natalizumab treatment for multiple sclerosis: updated recommendations for patient selection and monitoring

Journal

LANCET NEUROLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages 745-758

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70149-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Biogen Idec
  2. Actelion
  3. Advancell
  4. Allozyne
  5. BaroFold
  6. Bayer Health Care Pharmaceuticals
  7. Bayer Schering Pharma
  8. Bayhill
  9. BioMarin
  10. CLC Behring
  11. Elan
  12. Genmab
  13. Genmark
  14. GeNeuro SA
  15. GlaxoSmithKline
  16. Lilly
  17. Merck Serono
  18. MediciNova
  19. Novartis
  20. Novonordisk
  21. Peptimmune
  22. Sanofi-Aventis
  23. Santhera
  24. Roche
  25. Teva
  26. UCB
  27. Wyeth
  28. Biogen Idec, Serono
  29. Schering
  30. Teva Pharmaceuticals
  31. Bayer
  32. Biogen Idec, Schering
  33. Serono
  34. Genesis Pharma
  35. Bayer Healthcare
  36. Genzyme
  37. Bayer Schering, University of Dusseldorf
  38. Novartis Pharmaceuticals
  39. Octapharma
  40. Merck
  41. EMD Serono
  42. Bayer Schering
  43. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  44. Genentech
  45. Millennium
  46. Pfizer
  47. Wyeth-Pfizer
  48. Receptos
  49. BioMS
  50. Cognosci
  51. Daiichi Sankyo
  52. Autoimmune
  53. Pepgen
  54. Vascular Biogenics
  55. Biogen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Natalizumab, a highly specific alpha 4-integrin antagonist, is approved for treatment of patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). It is generally recommended for individuals who have not responded to a currently available first-line disease-modifying therapy or who have very active disease. The expected benefits of natalizumab treatment have to be weighed against risks, especially the rare but serious adverse event of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. In this Review, we revisit and update previous recommendations on natalizumab for treatment of patients with RRMS, based on additional long-term follow-up of clinical studies and post-marketing observations, including appropriate patient selection and management recommendations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available