4.7 Article

Intrastriatal transplantation of microcarrier-bound human retinal pigment epithelial cells versus sham surgery in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease: a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial

Journal

LANCET NEUROLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages 509-519

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70097-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Schering AG (now Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals)
  2. Bayer HealthCare AG
  3. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
  4. Schwartz Pharma
  5. Genzyme
  6. Acadia
  7. Solvay Pharmaceuticals
  8. Impax
  9. TEVA Neuroscience
  10. Merck/Serono
  11. Schering-Plough
  12. Novartis Pharmaceuticals
  13. IPSEN Pharmaceuticals
  14. XenoPort Pharmaceuticals
  15. Chelsea Therapeutics
  16. Allergan Neuroscience
  17. Molecular Biometrics
  18. Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
  19. National Parkinson Foundation
  20. Pfizer
  21. Desitin
  22. UCB
  23. University of South Florida, USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Human retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells produce levodopa and their transplantation into the striatum might improve continuity of administration compared with that achieved with oral levodopa. We aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of transplantation of microcarrier-bound human RPE cells versus a sham surgery control in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. Methods In this randomised, double-blind study eligible patients were aged 36-70 years, had been symptomatic for at least 5 year;, were in Hoehn and Yahr stage 3-4 and had unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) motor scores of 38-70 when off medication (off state), and had symptoms that responded to oral levodopa but were insufficiently controlled by optimised pharmacotherapy. Randomisation was done in a 1:1 ratio. Only the neurosurgical team was aware of treatment assignments. During stereotactic transplantation around 325 000 cells per side were injected into the postcommissural putamen; sham surgery patients received partial burr holes. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in UPDRS off-state motor score at 12 months. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00206687. Findings Of 71 enrolled patients, 35 underwent cell transplantation and 36 sham surgery. Change in mean motor scores did riot differ significantly between groups (-10.5 [SD 10.26] for transplantation vs -10.1 [SD 12.26] for sham surgery, p=0.9). The overall rate of adverse events was similar in the two study groups, although the number attributable to surgery or RPE cells (mostly neurological or psychiatric) was higher in transplant recipients. Two and seven patieats died in the sham surgery and transplantation group, respectively; one death in the latter group was possibly related to surgery or RPE cells. Interpretation Transplantation of human RPE cells provided no antiparkinsonian benefits compared with sham surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available