4.7 Article

Comparison of fingolimod with interferon beta-1a in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a randomised extension of the TRANSFORMS study

Journal

LANCET NEUROLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages 520-529

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70099-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Novartis Pharma AG
  2. Bayer
  3. Biogen Idec
  4. Caridian
  5. Novartis
  6. Pfizer
  7. Serono
  8. Teva
  9. Bayer Scheming Pharma
  10. Janssen Research
  11. Lundbeck
  12. Merck Serono
  13. Roche
  14. Sanofi-Aventis
  15. Serono Symposia Foundation
  16. Synthon BV
  17. UCB
  18. Bayer Schering Pharma
  19. Biogen Dompe
  20. Merck Serono International
  21. Serono Symposa International Foundation
  22. Bayer Healthcare
  23. Genzyme
  24. Actellion
  25. Advancell
  26. Allozyne
  27. Barofold
  28. Bayer Health Care Pharamceuticals
  29. Bayhill
  30. BioMarin
  31. CLC Behring
  32. Elan
  33. Genmab
  34. GeNeuro SA
  35. Genmark
  36. GlaxoSmithKline
  37. Lilly
  38. MediciNova
  39. Novartis Research Foundation
  40. Peptimmune
  41. Roche Research Foundation
  42. Santhera
  43. Wyeth
  44. Schering
  45. EMD Merck Serono
  46. Genentech
  47. Synthon

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background In a 12-month phase 3 study in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), TRANSFORMS, fingolimod showed greater efficacy on relapse rates and MRI outcomes compared with interferon beta-la. We had two aims in our extension: to compare year 2 with year 1 in the switched patients to assess the effect of a change from interferon beta-la to fingolimod, and to compare over 24 months the treatment groups as originally randomised to assess the effect of delaying the start of treatment with fingolimod. Methods Patients randomly assigned to receive 0.5 mg or 1.25 mg daily oral fingolimod in the core study continued with the same treatment in our extension; patients who originally received 30 mu g weekly intramuscular interferon beta-la were randomly reassigned (1:1) to receive either 0.5 mg or 1.25 mg fingolimod. The initial randomisation and dose of fingolimod assigned for the extension remained masked to the patients and investigators. As in the core study, re-randomisation was done centrally in blocks of six and stratified according to site. Our efficacy endpoints were annualised relapse rate (ARR), disability progression, and MRI outcomes. Our within-group analyses were based on the intention-to-treat and safety populations that entered our extension study. Our between-group analyses were based on the intention-to-treat and safety populations from the core study. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00340834. Findings 1027 patients entered our extension and received the study drug, and 882 completed 24 months of treatment. Patients receiving continuous fingolimod showed persistent benefits in ARR (0.5 mg fingolimod [n=356], 0.12 [95% CI 0.08-0.17] in months 0-12 vs 0-11 [0.08-0.16] in months 13-24; 1.25 mg fingolimod [n=330], 0-15 [0.10-0.21] vs 0.11 [0.08-0.16]; however, in patients who initially received interferon beta-la, ARR was lower after switching to fingolimod compared with the previous 12 months (interferon beta-la to 0.5 mg fingolimod [n=167], 0.31 [95% CI 0-22-0.43] in months 0-12 vs 0.22 [0.15-0.31], in months 13-24 p=0.049; interferon beta-la to 1.25 mg fingolimod [n=174], 0.29 [0.20-0-40] vs 0.18 [0-12-0.27], p=0.024). After switching to fingolimod, numbers of new or newly enlarging T2 and gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing T1 lesions were significantly reduced compared with the previous 12 months of interferon beta-la therapy (p<0.0001 for T2 lesions at both doses; p=0.002 for T1 at 0.5 mg; p=0.011 for T1 at 1.25 mg), and the pattern of adverse events shifted towards that typical for fingolimod. Over 24 months, in continuous fingolimod groups compared with the group that switched from interferon beta-la to fingolimod, we recorded lower ARRs (0-18 [95% CI 0.14-0.22] for 0.5 mg; 0.20 [0.16-0.25] for 1-25 mg; 0.33 [0.27-0-39] for the switch group; p<0.0001 for both comparisons), fewer new or newly enlarged T2 lesions (p=0.035 for 0.5 mg, p=0.068 for 1.25 mg), and fewer patients with Gd-enhancing T1 lesions (p=0.001 for 0.5 mg fingolimod vs switch group; p=0.002 for 1.25 mg fingolimod vs switch group). There was no benefit on disability progression. Interpretation Switching from interferon beta-la to fingolimod led to enhanced efficacy with no unexpected safety concerns. Compared with patients switched from interferon beta-la to fingolimod, continuous treatment with fingolimod for 2 years provides a sustained treatment effect with improved clinical and MRI outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available