4.7 Review

Blood pressure as a prognostic factor after acute stroke

Journal

LANCET NEUROLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages 938-948

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70184-X

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. The European Union [IC15-CT98-0329-EPOGH, LSHM-CT-2006-037093]
  2. Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen
  3. Ministry of the Flemish Community, Brussels, Belgium [G.0424.03, G.0575.06]
  4. University of Leuven, Belgium [OT/00/25, OT/05/49]
  5. The Bilateral Scientific and Technological Collaboration between China and Flanders, Ministry of the Flemish Community, Brussels [BIL02/10]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stroke is the second most common cause of death worldwide and is the complication of hypertension that is most directly linked to blood pressure. Hypertension affects nearly 30% of the world's population; therefore, reducing blood pressure is key for the prevention of stroke. Unlike the established role of hypertension as a risk factor for stroke, the prognostic importance of blood pressure in determining outcome after acute stroke is unclear. The acute hypertensive response occurs in more than 50% of all patients with acute stroke and is associated with poor prognosis. The relation between the outcome of acute stroke and blood pressure is U-shaped, with the best outcome at systolic blood-pressure levels ranging from about 140 to 180 mm Hg. The evidence that decreasing blood pressure in hypertensive patients with acute ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke improves prognosis needs further confirmation. Whether raising blood pressure to improve perfusion of ischaemic brain areas is beneficial remains even more uncertain. Present guidelines for the management of blood pressure in patients with acute stroke are not evidence-based, but results from ongoing trials might provide more informed recommendations for the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available