4.7 Review

Biomarkers in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Journal

LANCET NEUROLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 94-109

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70293-X

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council/Motor Neurone Disease Association Lady Edith Wolfson Clinician Scientist Fellowship
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [510233]
  3. Motor Neurone Disease Association and Medical Research Council
  4. MRC [G0701923] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [G0701923] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS; motor neuron disease) is a relentlessly progressive disorder. After half a century of trials, only one drug with modest disease-modifying potency-riluzole-has been developed. The diagnosis of this disorder is still clinical and there is a pronounced delay between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis, possibly beyond the therapeutic window. Bedside quantification of the involvement of the corticospinal tract and extramotor areas is inadequate and functional rating scales, forced vital capacity and patient survival have been the measures of therapeutic response so far. Potential biomarkers that are sensitive to the progression of disease, which might enhance the diagnostic algorithm and provide new drug targets, are now being identified from analysis of the blood and cerebrospinal fluid, as well as from neuroimaging and neurophysiology studies. In combination, these biomarkers might be sensitive to early therapeutic effects and would reduce our reliance on animal models, which have uncertain relevance to sporadic ALS in human beings. Such biomarkers might also resolve complexities of phenotypic heterogeneity in clinical trials. In this Review, we discuss the development of biomarkers in ALS and consider potential future directions for research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available