4.7 Review

Clinical management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia

Journal

LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 208-222

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70285-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Novartis
  2. Special Trustees of the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London, UK
  3. Wellcome Trust, UK
  4. Department of Health via the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
  5. Department of Health via the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
  6. UK MRC
  7. NIHR Oxford BioMedical Research Centre
  8. University College London Comprehensive Biomedical Centre
  9. Department of Health's NIHR Biomedical Research Centres
  10. MRC [G0701652] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. National Institute for Health Research [ACF-2008-18-017, ACF-2007-27-002] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia is one of the most common serious bacterial infections worldwide. In the UK alone, around 12 500 cases each year are reported, with an associated mortality of about 30%, yet the evidence guiding optimum management is poor. To date, fewer than 1500 patients with S aureus bacteraemia have been recruited to 16 controlled trials of antimicrobial therapy. Consequently, clinical practice is driven by the results of observational studies and anecdote. Here, we propose and review ten unanswered clinical questions commonly posed by those managing S aureus bacteraemia. Our findings define the major areas of uncertainty in the management of S aureus bacteraemia and highlight just two key principles. First, all infective foci must be identified and removed as soon as possible. Second, long-term antimicrobial therapy is required for those with persistent bacteraemia or a deep, irremovable focus. Beyond this, the best drugs, dose, mode of delivery, and duration of therapy are uncertain, a situation compounded by emerging S aureus strains that are resistant to old and new antibiotics. We discuss the consequences on clinical practice, and how these findings define the agenda for future clinical research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available